A federal court in Nebraska has ruled that USCIS’s two-step Kazarian framework for EB1A visa petitions is unlawful. In the case of Mukherji v. Miller, the court ordered USCIS to approve a petition from a journalist who met five of the ten criteria for the EB1A classification. This ruling marks a significant shift in how USCIS evaluates EB1A petitions, which could affect many applicants moving forward.
Key Details:
- Court: Nebraska District Court
- Case: Mukherji v. Miller
- Ruling: USCIS’s two-step Kazarian framework deemed unlawful
- Petitioner: A journalist who met five out of ten EB1A criteria
This decision may lead to a reevaluation of pending EB1A petitions and could streamline the approval process for future applicants. Need help with your immigration case? Visit QuickFiling.us for professional immigration services.
Source: RvrSuram