<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Economics on US Immigration, Explained Daily</title><link>https://usimmigration.today/tags/economics/</link><description>Recent content in Economics on US Immigration, Explained Daily</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://usimmigration.today/tags/economics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Navigating NIW RFE: Insights from a PhD Applicant</title><link>https://usimmigration.today/news/navigating-niw-rfe-insights-from-a-phd-applicant/</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://usimmigration.today/news/navigating-niw-rfe-insights-from-a-phd-applicant/</guid><description>&lt;p>A Reddit user has reported receiving a Request for Evidence (RFE) regarding their National Interest Waiver (NIW) application, specifically addressing all three prongs of the NIW criteria. The applicant, who holds a PhD in Economics and works in a director-level role at a major bank, filed their petition under premium processing with Ellis Porter, and their case is currently at the Texas Service Center (TSC).&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>Key Details:&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>The RFE raised concerns about the applicant&amp;rsquo;s evidence for all three prongs of the NIW criteria.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>For Prong 1, USCIS acknowledged substantial merit but criticized the lack of broader industry implications of the applicant&amp;rsquo;s AI endeavor.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>In Prong 2, USCIS noted that while the applicant&amp;rsquo;s publications were acknowledged, they were not seen as significant breakthroughs in the field.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Prong 3 highlighted that the applicant did not demonstrate exceptional value that would outweigh the standard labor certification process.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>The applicant expressed dissatisfaction with how their initial petition was framed, feeling it resembled a general resume rather than emphasizing the U.S. impact of their work. They are now revising their personal statement and adding supporting documents to address the RFE concerns.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>