<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Behdin v. Edlow on US Immigration, Explained Daily</title><link>https://usimmigration.today/tags/behdin-v.-edlow/</link><description>Recent content in Behdin v. Edlow on US Immigration, Explained Daily</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://usimmigration.today/tags/behdin-v.-edlow/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Judge Orders USCIS to Lift Hold on Premium Processing Fees</title><link>https://usimmigration.today/news/judge-orders-uscis-to-lift-hold-on-premium-processing-fees/</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://usimmigration.today/news/judge-orders-uscis-to-lift-hold-on-premium-processing-fees/</guid><description>&lt;p>In a significant ruling on October 23, 2023, Judge van Keulen ordered the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to lift its hold on premium processing fees in the case of Behdin v. Edlow. The judge criticized USCIS for collecting $1,645 in premium processing fees from plaintiffs without providing any adjudications or refunds, raising concerns about the agency&amp;rsquo;s practices regarding fee management.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>Key Details:&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Court ruling date: October 23, 2023&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Case: Behdin v. Edlow&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Premium processing fee: $1,645&lt;/li>
&lt;li>USCIS failed to process applications or issue refunds&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>This ruling could have significant implications for affected applicants who have been waiting for their cases to be adjudicated after paying for expedited processing. &lt;em>Need help with your immigration case? Visit &lt;a href="https://quickfiling.us"target="_blank"
 class="inline-flex items-center gap-1"
>QuickFiling.us&lt;svg class="h-3 w-3 flex-shrink-0" id="external-link" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24">&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M15 3h6v6m-11 5L21 3m-3 10v6a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H5a2 2 0 0 1-2-2V8a2 2 0 0 1 2-2h6"/>&lt;/svg>
&lt;/a> for professional immigration services.&lt;/em>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Federal Court Blocks USCIS EAD Decision Delays</title><link>https://usimmigration.today/news/federal-court-blocks-uscis-ead-decision-delays/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://usimmigration.today/news/federal-court-blocks-uscis-ead-decision-delays/</guid><description>&lt;p>A federal court has issued a preliminary injunction against the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) regarding an &amp;ldquo;adjudicative hold&amp;rdquo; that had been indefinitely delaying work authorization (EAD) decisions for certain applicants. This ruling comes as part of the case Behdin v. Edlow, aimed at expediting the processing of EAD applications that have faced prolonged delays.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>Key Details:&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>The injunction specifically targets the indefinite hold on EAD decisions.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Affected applicants can expect a resumption of processing for their work authorization applications.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>The court&amp;rsquo;s decision reflects ongoing concerns about delays in the immigration system.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>This ruling may set a precedent for future cases regarding USCIS processing times.&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>The impact of this ruling is significant for many immigrants awaiting work authorization, as it may lead to quicker decisions and the ability to begin or continue employment. &lt;em>Need help with your immigration case? Visit &lt;a href="https://quickfiling.us"target="_blank"
 class="inline-flex items-center gap-1"
>QuickFiling.us&lt;svg class="h-3 w-3 flex-shrink-0" id="external-link" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24">&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M15 3h6v6m-11 5L21 3m-3 10v6a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H5a2 2 0 0 1-2-2V8a2 2 0 0 1 2-2h6"/>&lt;/svg>
&lt;/a> for professional immigration services.&lt;/em>&lt;/p></description></item><item><title>Judge Orders USCIS to Adjudicate I-765s Within 180 Days</title><link>https://usimmigration.today/news/judge-orders-uscis-to-adjudicate-i-765s-within-180-days/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://usimmigration.today/news/judge-orders-uscis-to-adjudicate-i-765s-within-180-days/</guid><description>&lt;p>A federal judge in the Northern District of California has ruled against the indefinite hold on I-765 applications, ordering USCIS to adjudicate these applications within 180 days for all named plaintiffs in the case Behdin v. Edlow. This decision challenges the previous practice of holding applications indefinitely, indicating a shift in judicial perspective regarding processing times.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>&lt;strong>Key Details:&lt;/strong>&lt;/p>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>Judge: Van Keulen, Northern District of California&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Order issued: USCIS must process I-765 applications within 180 days&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Affects: All named plaintiffs in Behdin v. Edlow&lt;/li>
&lt;li>Implication: Courts are rejecting the indefinite hold theory on immigration applications&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul>
&lt;p>This ruling is expected to expedite the processing of work authorization applications for affected immigrants. &lt;em>Need help with your immigration case? Visit &lt;a href="https://quickfiling.us"target="_blank"
 class="inline-flex items-center gap-1"
>QuickFiling.us&lt;svg class="h-3 w-3 flex-shrink-0" id="external-link" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24">&lt;path fill="none" stroke="currentColor" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round" stroke-width="2" d="M15 3h6v6m-11 5L21 3m-3 10v6a2 2 0 0 1-2 2H5a2 2 0 0 1-2-2V8a2 2 0 0 1 2-2h6"/>&lt;/svg>
&lt;/a> for professional immigration services.&lt;/em>&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>